NYC streetlight contracts · 2003–2026
92% of $1.32B goes to two companies

Welsbach Electric and Hellman Electric together take $883M of the $1.32B in NYC streetlight and traffic-signal contracts on record. The other 1,883 NYC-licensed electricians compete for the remainder — or more often, get nothing at all.

The 2019 rule nobody's using

A law has existed since 2019 to fix this.

NYC PPB Rule 3-08 lets any agency buy directly from a certified M/WBE vendor for up to $1.5M per purchase — no competitive solicitation required. For a $5,000 streetlight repair, the rule applies trivially.

We identified 101 NYC-licensed electricians who are eligible under this rule — minority- and women-owned, PASSPort-enrolled, active license, NAICS-matched. Across all five boroughs. The city is using almost none of them.

What we built

A matrix that ranks the 101.

Submit a streetlight complaint. Our tool ranks the 101 direct-purchase-eligible electricians across eight weighted components — proximity, license tenure, owner-demographic equity, recent workload, and four more — then surfaces the top five for your address with full score transparency.

Same complaint. Same 2019 rule. A vendor pool the city already had — but wasn't using.

The matrix, in eight components

Each weight earns its keep against the rule.

PPB Rule 3-08 doesn't tell agencies which M/WBE vendor to pick — it just tells them the conditions under which they can pick one directly. Our matrix scores eight signals that, together, answer the rule's implicit "responsibility determination" question with full transparency. Every weight maps to a specific clause of the rule or to the policy intent the rule serves.

1 17 / 100

Workload balance

Inverse — fewer recent dispatches from our platform earns higher. 60-day half-life decay.

Rule alignment: 3-08's intent is to expand who receives city work. Cycling through eligible vendors instead of repeatedly defaulting to the same one is the practical implementation of that intent.

2 18 / 100

Overlooked-but-qualified

Inverse, modulated by tenure. Vendors with the license and the track record but no city contracts score highest.

Rule alignment: 3-08 exists precisely to reach vendors outside the standard rotation. This component is the rule's intent encoded directly as a scoring signal.

3 15 / 100

Direct-purchase eligibility

Binary. Active M/WBE certification + PASSPort enrollment + active license + NAICS match + cert not expired.

Rule alignment: This IS the rule's literal four-part eligibility test. A vendor that fails any condition cannot legally receive a direct-purchase dispatch.

4 15 / 100

Demographic equity

Stackable. MBE +6 · WBE +6 · LBE/EBE +2 · ethnicity +2. Cap at 15.

Rule alignment: 3-08 is the M/WBE-specific small-purchase rule — designed by name for the certifications this component rewards. Stacking favors intersectional ownership.

5 18 / 100

Proximity

Quadratic decay. 0 mi = full points · 5 mi ≈ 4 pts · 10 mi ≈ 1 pt.

Rule alignment: 3-08 requires the contracting officer to verify vendor capacity to perform. For physical repair work, response distance is a direct capacity signal — closer vendors are more likely to actually complete the work on schedule.

6 10 / 100

Reliability

Positive. Active license, no recent contract terminations or amendments. Each termination subtracts 2 pts.

Rule alignment: 3-08's responsibility determination requires the contracting officer to verify the vendor is in good standing. This component captures the license-status check the rule mandates.

7 4 / 100

Baseline capability

Binary floor. Active license AND (any past city contract OR M/WBE directory entry). Pure floor — not a kingmaker.

Rule alignment: 3-08 requires the purchase to match the vendor's NIGP/NAICS code. This floor confirms the vendor has at least one external signal of capability beyond the license itself.

8 3 / 100

Capacity headroom

Inverse. Vendors with low recent contract dollar volume have room to take work without saturation.

Rule alignment: 3-08's responsibility test implicitly requires assessing whether the vendor can actually absorb the work. Empty recent workload = clear headroom.

Components 3, 4, and 6 are required by the literal text of PPB Rule 3-08. Components 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 operationalize the rule's responsibility-determination and equity-expansion intent. Every dispatch through this tool comes with a complete per-component breakdown the agency can include in its dispatch record.

Try it

Submit a complaint. See the matrix work.

Enter any NYC address with a broken streetlight. The tool ranks the 101 direct-purchase-eligible electricians against your complaint location and surfaces the top five — each with the full score breakdown so you can see exactly why they were picked. If fewer than five eligible vendors sit within 10 miles, the matrix gracefully expands to the next tier and tells you it did.

Step 1 of 3

Report an outage.

Sixty seconds. Address, type, photos. We'll classify, dispatch, and draft the work order.

or enter the address manually
Drag and drop photos here, or
We'll never share your information.
Step 3 of 3

Generate the procurement paperwork.

Pick a vendor above and we'll auto-generate the M/WBE Noncompetitive Small Purchase Authorization memo per PPB Rule 3-08(c)(1)(iv) — the one-page document the agency files to authorize a direct-purchase dispatch under the 2019 rule.

What the memo contains

  • NYC Department of Transportation letterhead — Division of Street Lighting
  • Section 1 — Procurement Summary: work-order number, complaint type, NIGP / NAICS codes, site address, priority, est. completion days
  • Section 2 — Policy Authority: PPB Rule 3-08(c)(1)(iv) citation, confirmation of active SBS M/WBE certification, $1.5M-threshold check
  • Section 3 — Price Quotes: structured fields for the 3-quote rule (or unable-to-obtain explanation), with price-reasonableness determination
  • Section 4 — Selected Vendor: legal business name, address, SBS certification ID, certification type, license #, contact
  • Section 5 — Responsibility Determination Checklist: pre-filled attestations
  • Section 6 — Authorization: signature blocks for contracting officer + supervisor

Once you select a vendor on the map, the Download memo button on the right activates. The PDF generates client-side and downloads instantly with all vendor fields pre-populated.

Selected vendor
No vendor selected yet.
PPB Rule 3-08 memo

Auto-fills with the selected vendor's certification data, the complaint details, and the rule citation. Review, sign, and file.

Awaiting vendor selection…
Equity impact

What this complaint redistributes.

Every dispatch through this tool routes work that would otherwise have gone to Welsbach or Hellman to a small minority- or women-owned electrician within 10 miles of the complaint. The numbers below show the immediate impact of your complaint, and the citywide impact if the matrix were used at scale.

This complaint pays
$5,000
to your selected vendor
If this matrix runs your block all year
$—
to small-business electricians within 2 mi
If NYC ran this matrix citywide
$50.7M / yr
redirected from 2 primes to 101 M/WBE electricians

Where the $1.32B currently goes

From NYC OpenData "Recent Contract Awards" (qyyg-4tf5), filtered to DOT, DDC, and 6 other agencies × electrical-trade keywords (2003-2026).

Welsbach · 49%
Hellman · 18%
10 others · 25%
Rest · 8%

1,883 of 1,894 NYC-licensed electricians (99.4%) hold zero direct DOT/DDC/DCAS streetlight or electrical contracts.

Where it could go under the 2019 rule

101 NYC electricians are direct-purchase-eligible under PPB Rule 3-08: M/WBE-certified, PASSPort-enrolled, NAICS-matched, active license.

38
Black-owned
28
Hispanic-owned
17
Asian-owned
18
Women-owned (non-minority)

Distributed across every borough — 29 Queens, 28 Brooklyn, 18 Bronx, 13 Manhattan, 13 Staten Island.

Why this matters

A rule, finally used.

New York City has spent seven years with a procurement rule that lets agencies route up to $1.5M per purchase directly to certified M/WBE vendors. It has done so for streetlight repairs essentially zero times. Our tool exists to change three things at once:

Wealth, not just light. $50M+ per year of NYC streetlight work that currently flows to two large primes could instead route to 101 minority- and women-owned electricians across all five boroughs — at the same per-job cost, under existing law, with no procurement reform required.

Transparency, not friction. Every dispatch logs why a vendor was picked — score, components, demographic identity, distance, prior city work. Reviewers can replay any decision the system makes. Procurement staff get auto-generated PPB Rule 3-08 justification memos in place of hours of paperwork.

Vendors discoverable, not invisible. 1,733 NYC-licensed electricians today hold zero direct city contracts and no M/WBE certification on file. The matrix surfaces the 101 who are eligible, points the next 48 toward eligibility (one missing criterion), and turns the rest into a knowable, geocoded pool the city can actually see.

Three changes. No new laws. Same complaints. Same budget. Different recipients of the dollars.

How it works

From complaint to local crew.

A streetlight complaint passes through seven stages before a vendor is on-site. Four are paperwork bottlenecks that today take days. The matrix collapses them to seconds — and at step 5, it surfaces a direct-purchase-eligible local vendor instead of defaulting to the two incumbent primes.

1
Citizen submits report
instant
2
Classify complaint type & priority
~1 day < 1 sec
3
Route to the correct agency
~days instant
4
Draft DOT-format work order
~30 min < 60 sec
5
Match a direct-purchase-eligible local vendor via the equity-first matrix
routed to incumbent prime M/WBE under PPB Rule 3-08
6
Vendor dispatched to site
hours
7
Repair completed & logged
varies

Steps 2–5 collapse from roughly a week of paperwork into under two minutes — and at step 5, the matrix routes the work to a vendor the city already has on file but isn't using. Steps 1, 6, and 7 are physical-world events the tool doesn't speed up but also doesn't get in the way of.

A framework, not a feature

Three more 311 backlogs. Same matrix.

The matrix works wherever three conditions stack: a concentrated procurement structure where a handful of firms take most of the dollars, an under-used equity policy lever, and a public vendor roster the city already maintains. We identified three additional NYC 311 categories that fit every condition.

DOT · Sidewalk Condition

Sidewalk repair

$30M / yr
redirectable to M/WBE concrete contractors
Policy lever
PPB Rule 3-08 ($1.5M cap). Typical sidewalk reconstruction line items run $5K–$300K per block — well inside the cap.
Current concentration
Triumph Construction, Tully Construction, and JR Cruz Corp. take the majority of ~$100M/yr in DOT sidewalk reconstruction awards.
Companies we'd surface
~150 M/WBE-certified concrete/sidewalk firms in NYC SBS directory, plus ~600–900 active DCWP Home Improvement Contractor licensees with concrete-trade keywords.
Datasets
SBS ci93-uc8s (M/WBE), acd4-wkax (DCWP HIC), ckqw-hc7u (DOB GC permits).
DPR · Damaged / Overgrown Tree

Tree pruning

$15M / yr
redirectable to M/WBE arborist firms
Policy lever
PPB Rule 3-08 applies. The current $8M+ block contracts can be decomposed into per-community-district task orders ($800K–$1.4M each), individually procurable inside the cap.
Current concentration
Dragonetti Brothers Landscaping holds Queens + Brooklyn block pruning despite an active DOI monitorship — and was re-awarded a $22M trimming package in 2024. SavATree holds Manhattan/Bronx.
Companies we'd surface
~60–90 M/WBE-certified landscaping and arborist firms in the SBS directory. Required credential is an ISA Certified Arborist on staff — substantially lighter than electrician licensure.
Datasets
SBS ci93-uc8s, DPR Forestry Work Orders bdjm-n7q4, Tree Points hn5i-inap.
HPD · Lead Paint Complaint

Lead paint abatement

$15M / yr
redirectable to M/WBE abatement firms
Policy lever (stacked)
PPB Rule 3-08 plus HPD's Emergency Repair Program Pre-Qualified List (random selection rule). Two equity levers, not one — strongest case of the three.
Current concentration
Accredited Environmental Solutions, ABCZ Consulting, and EnviroNYC dominate HPD's small PQL of ~10–15 prequalified lead-abatement firms. Local Law 31 XRF demand pushing market past $50M/yr.
Companies we'd surface
~40–60 M/WBE-certified abatement firms in SBS, validated against the ~250 NYC-area EPA RRP-certified firms.
Datasets
SBS ci93-uc8s, Asbestos Control Program vq35-j9qm (lead/asbestos firms overlap heavily), EPA RRP Firm registry.

$60M / yr in equity-redirectable city spending across these three trades, on top of streetlights — distributed across roughly 280 minority- and women-owned NYC firms who pass the same eligibility tests but rarely see direct city work. Same rule. Same matrix. Three new docket categories, three different agencies, one consistent story.

Next city · San Francisco

The same matrix, where the city is asking for it.

San Francisco is structurally more receptive to this kind of tool than New York. Three converging conditions — a recent procurement scandal, an active Controller's investigation, and a Mayor's office that has explicitly named small-business equity as a priority — line up to make SF the natural second deployment.

$151M
of pre-qualified contractor pools flagged as fraud-risk in the SF Controller's 2024 Public Integrity Review, with a specific recommendation for the transparency layer this tool provides.
7 yrs
federal prison sentence handed to former DPW Director Mohammed Nuru for honest-services fraud. The procurement-reform appetite that scandal created has not gone away.
Jan 2025
amendments to SF Administrative Code Chapter 14B went live: Micro-LBE construction set-aside up to $600K, 10% LBE bid discount, broader SBA-LBE bump. SF's analog to PPB Rule 3-08.

v1 target: sidewalk repair (SIRP).

SF streetlights are maintained in-house by SFPUC and PG&E — no contractor pool exists to redistribute. SIRP is the right v1 because it has the same shape as our NYC streetlight case:

  • ~$35M/yr in SIRP work, concentrated among ~5-8 prime C-8 concrete contractors (Triumph, Tully, JR Cruz analogs).
  • Existing 23% LBE subcontracting goal already in SIRP — the policy intent is already there; the operational infrastructure isn't.
  • Work-order packages typically $50K-$500K — well inside Chapter 14B's $600K Micro-LBE set-aside ceiling.
  • SF 311 already exposes sidewalk-condition complaints as a public category citizens file directly.
~$6.1M / yr
projected redirectable to 80-150 LBE-certified C-8 firms across SF, averaging $40-75K uplift per firm. Stretch case adds another $5M/yr if tree-maintenance v2 follows under the StreetTreeSF M03 master contract.

We already have the network.

Unlike NYC, where we still need an institutional bridge to SBS or MOCS, SF gives us viable contact paths in multiple offices:

  • City Administrator's office (Carmen Chu, Deputy CA Stephanie Tang) — oversees CMD, the agency that runs 14B.
  • CMD Director Regina Chan — gatekeeper to the LBE certified-firms directory we need for the matrix.
  • DPW Director Carla Short — owns SIRP; the pilot lives in her department.
  • Controller Greg Wagner — already publicly committed to procurement transparency via the 2024 PIR.
  • Civic Bridge at the Mayor's Office of Civic Innovation — the canonical 16-week pro-bono engagement channel for exactly this kind of tool.

The ask is the same shape as NYC, easier to land: a 90-day pilot in one DPW district with success criteria of ≥30 dispatches, ≥40% routed to Micro-LBE or LBE firms, and ≥80% citizen satisfaction at the 30-day check-in. No new spending. No new mandates. Just operationalizing a rule the city already enacted, with the transparency layer the Controller's office has already recommended.

Same matrix. Same 8 components. New city. New rule citation. Same story: a 2024 reform that hasn't reached the last mile, and a software problem that closes it.

Built on NYC OpenData (erm2-nwe9). Every chart, every claim — Sources & methodology →